BlackRock says it wants to do more for the climate
The proof will be in its investment and shareholder-voting strategies
“I BELIEVE WE are on the edge of a fundamental reshaping of finance,” wrote Larry Fink, the boss of BlackRock, the planet’s biggest fund manager, in an open letter on January 14th. His annual missives, addressed to clients and the bosses of companies in which BlackRock invests, are widely read. This year’s, which argues that climate change is a big investment risk that could cause market havoc sooner than most expect, was no exception.
The letter also said what BlackRock, which has $7.43trn in assets under management, plans to do. First, it will demand greater disclosure from all firms on their carbon emissions and climate risks. Because BlackRock has huge clout, this will make a difference. Second, it will double its offering of sustainable funds to 150. The aim is that BlackRock’s sustainable assets will rise from $90bn to $1trn within a decade. Finally, it has pledged to change how it runs its actively managed portfolios, which account for 27% of its total assets. It will dispose of public securities issued by any firm that makes over a quarter of its revenue from thermal coal—the type used to generate electricity.
The direct impact will be limited: the pledged coal divestments, for example, are less than 0.1% of BlackRock’s assets. The indirect impacts may be larger, as firms are prodded to improve disclosure and the share of assets run under green mandates rises. Part of Mr Fink’s motivation is self-interest. Climate change is the biggest concern of BlackRock’s clients, he says. Even as a price war in passive fund management rages, demand for green investment funds is soaring. And BlackRock will integrate climate analysis into Aladdin, a risk-management system that it sells to many other financial firms.
Mr Fink’s professions of greenery did not come out of the blue. In 2018 his letter, entitled “A sense of purpose”, said that firms should do more than create shareholder value. But they imply big changes for BlackRock. In 2019 it opposed 93% of shareholder resolutions in America urging companies to become greener, compared with an industry average of 56%, according to Morningstar, a research firm. It only recently joined Climate Action 100+, a coalition of asset managers that presses big polluters to clean up.
So is the letter so much greenwash? A good test is whether BlackRock’s active and passive funds vote against the expansion plans of fossil-fuel firms they invest in. These imply big increases in carbon emissions, says Mark Campanale of Carbon Tracker, a think-tank. Over to you, Larry. ■
Sign up to our fortnightly climate-change newsletter here
This article appeared in the Finance & economics section of the print edition under the headline "Green giant"
Finance & economics January 18th 2020
- Emerging economies are experiencing a prolonged productivity slowdown
- What the semiconductor industry tells us about the world economy
- Oil markets shrug off tension in the Middle East
- The new US-China trade deal marks an uneasy truce
- BlackRock says it wants to do more for the climate
- Economists explore the consequences of steering technological progress
Discover more
China’s banks have a bad-debt problem
As is becoming increasingly obvious
Which country will be last to escape inflation?
A new dividing line in the global fight
How the “Magnificent Seven” misleads
Forget the supergroup of stockmarket darlings